This is a repost of an essay I put on a Rotten Tomatoes forum:
So, I was putting up the Christmas tree tonight and drinking some fine Scotch and thinking about Avatar and the fine folks here on the RT forums. Here is why I think Avatar will continue to do well and rake in lots of money and maybe even take Best Picture. Know at the outset that none of this is meant to insult anybody or take sides. They are just my thoughts.
We here on the RT forums tend to forget that, although we are vocal, we are a minuscule portion of the movie-going public. If the movie going audience was a dog, we would be the tinest flea gnawing on its ass. There are maybe forty people who come in to these debates, and only 10 or so with any regularity.
We like to think we are tuned to a higher sensibility, and perhaps we are. The arguments we have over CGI realism is driven (I’m pretty sure) by a desire to see the art form move forward, and to force the talent behind it to be the best they can be, to wow us and show us things we don’t normally see and make them as real as possible.
We also want a better story. We want to hear lines we haven’t heard before, watch plots that aren’t derivitive, and see things told in a new way.
But you know what? THE AVERAGE MOVIE GOER DOESN’T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THIS. They want to be wowed and they want to be entertained and they want familiarity. The reason Transformers and Transformers 2 did so well is because it wowed people with cool robots and explosions, had the familiarity of being a childhood memory, and had a story that, while it didn’t make a whole lot of sense to me, provided the basic elements and had what people wanted. It’s no secret I didn’t like the movie, but several of my friends enjoyed it very much. That’s fine.
People like to see justice done. They like to see the good guys win and the bad guys taken down. Transformer 2 (and Transformers) had that. And just for the record, I liked the first Transformers.
New Moon is another good excample. It had the familiarity of being a best-selling book, and the story itself is little more than a vampiric variation of Romeo and Juliet. Again, it’s familiar. People like things they’ve seen before. That’s why they buy DVDs and watch them over and over. Familiarity equals comfort.
And so we come to Avatar. The special effects are extraordinary. There are some who argue differently, and that’s fine. Again, they are tuned to a higher sensibility, but to the average moviegoer, the FX are jaw-droppingly beautiful and astoundingly realistic. As I walked out of the theater both times, all around me people were buzzing about what they saw. The friends I took proclaimed it the best thing they’ve ever seen. These are people who don’t watch “Science at the Movies” or read articles about how it’s all made. These are average moviegoers. John Q. Public.
The same holds for the story. Yes, it’s derivitive of Dances With Wolves and Ferngully and Battle for Terra and Aliens and even a little bit of Apocalypse Now thrown in there. But the average movie-goer doesn’t care. Again, good guys win, bad guys punished. People want to know what’s going to happen. In a grand entertainment, they like feeling one step ahead.
Filmmakers and scriptwriters are in a “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” position. If they make something too predictable, they are accused of being formulaic. If they make it too esoteric, nobody wants to watch it, becuase they don’t understand it, and thus are not entertained by it. James Cameron had a bit of a straight jacket on him. He spent $300 million dollars. If he made the story too high-brow, too science-fictiony, it would have been a niche film, appealing to a very limited audience (Think about Donnie Darko or Mulholland Drive. Great movies, but limited audience appeal)
Therefore, he had to go with a familiar story, and he follows the classic three-act structure beatifully. He’s giving the audience exactly what they want. Wow factor + familirity = hit movie. It scored 83%, which means four out of five critics liked it. I’m guessing the audience reaction is following pretty much along those same lines, so people will tell their friends to see it, and they’ll tell their friends. And Avatar will continue to make money. Will it beat Titanic? Doubtful. Will it be in the top ten? Most likely.
Cameron has done exactly what he set out to do. Titanic also had the wow factor plus familiarity motif, and it won 11 Oscars and became the all-time box office champ. And the Academy has already had a favorable screening, so don’t be surprised if, come March 2010, we see Cameron walking up to accept a gold statue. After all, it’s something we’ve seen before, and people love a familiar story.

Chris
January 11th, 2010 at 11:00
Well it looks like it made it into the top 10 grossing movies of all time world wide. IT is sitting at Number 2 right now. See I think a lot of people that talk about the FX being “OK” are missing the point that there are no stages or scenes shot on location outside in that movie. EVERYTHING thing is CG!. They didn’t film some cool jungle scene and then put CG bugs and animals in the scene. The waterfall in the beginning wasn’t in South America somewhere that they inserted Jake’s Avatar into the scene. The ENTIRE EXTERIOR of Pandora is CG!! People fail to remember this because it looks so real. They are talking about how yeah the Avatars look like big blue monkey people and “sure they look real but I have seen this before”. No you have not. There has never been a movie that was more fake that looked more real then Avatar.
$600,000,000 more worldwide to become the champ and I wouldn’t be surprised if this get at least 8 oscars. There has only ever been 2 SciFi movies nominated for Best Picture. Star Wars and E.T. I am hopeful this get the Nod. It is just a shame that the actors will get nothing. I hope at least Sigourney Weaver gets a nod.
Hope Ivrin
February 2nd, 2010 at 22:20
Throughout the film, I was momentarily jarred by many of the similar things that were been mentioned here, but for the most part, I overcame them as my pleasure continued. Even the over zealous expression of commercialism or the over bearing were accepted as being a critical part of the film.But there one technical thing that (oddly enough, I guess) irritated me. There was no way to go back and watch it again, but I’m pretty sure that when the Colonel was killed, he took his hands off the robot controls, trying to remove the arrow/bolt. Yet, with the Colonel’s death, the robot TOPPLED OVER! I would have expected such a machine just to simply stop moving and stand there.